|
本文は今は無条件に亡命者を受け入れるが、６ヶ月後には国ごとの割当ができてしまう。
設問は、自国の仲間を亡命させようと試みているJ国のある人は、割当の（悪）影響を最小化させたい。彼が取るべき効果的な行動は何でしょう？
ということなので、割当ができてしまう前に、自分の仲間をM国に亡命させてしまえば、彼の目的「仲間を亡命させる」が割当の影響を受けないですむ。だから、仲間をできる限り早く（６ヶ月以内に）亡命するよう説得することが、彼のできる最も効率的な行動である。
ということでいかがでしょうか？
> ＣＲ１問教えてください。
> よろしくお願いします。
>
> Country M has a new immigration policy allowing those who have been refused asylum by other countries to become full-fledged citizens of Country M. The result will clearly be a large surge in immigration applications, which, after a few years, will force Country M to institute quotas, granting entry only to a fixed percentage of total applicants from each country, based on the level of previous immigration from that country.
>
> If the hypothetical quotas of Country M were to be imposed in 6 months, and a citizen of Country J wanted to minimize the impact of these immigration quotas on the attempts of his fellow countrymen to emigrate to Country M, which of the following would be the most effective action for him to take?
>
> (A) Agree with other citizens of Country J to cut back voluntarily on emigration.
> (B) Seek a new agreement with the government of Country M to allow any citizen of Country J asylum.
> (C) Attempt to alter the policies of Country J so that there willl no longer be any need to seek asylum.
> (D) Convince his fellow countrymen who wish to emigrate to Country M to do so as soon as possible.
> (E) Choose impressive citizens of Country J to immediately apply for asylum in Country M.
>
> →正解は（Ｄ）です。
>
> 何故、（Ｄ）なのでしょうか？
> as soon as possible にポイントがありそうな気はします。
> 本文は意味が分かる（つもり）のですが、設問がイマイチよく理解できていないのだと思います。
>
>
|
