|
> 以下問題が解説を読んでもわかりません。
> どなたか教えて下さい。宜しくお願いします。
> Even though most universities retain the royalties from faculty members’ inventions, the faculty members retain the royalties from books and articles they write. Therefore, faculty members should retain the royalties from the educational computer software they develop.
典型的なGMAT CRのパターンの１つですね。
most universities retain the royalties from faculty members’ inventions
つまり、言い換えると
faculty members don't retain the royalties from their inventions.
さらに、
the faculty members retain royalties from books.
これら２つのpremiseから、
faculty members should retain the royalties from the software.
という結論を導いています。
つまり、the software は、inventionのように扱われるのでなく、booksのように扱われるというassumptionがあります。
だから、faculty members should retain the royalties from the software.と結論付けることができるのです。
>
> The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?
>
> A)Royalties from inventions are higher than royalties from educational software programs
> B)Faculty members are more likely to produce educational software programs than inventions.
> C)Inventions bring more prestige to universities than do books and articles.
> D)In the experience of most universities, educational software programs are more marketable than are books and articles.
> E)In terms of the criteria used to award royalties, educational software programs are more nearly comparable to books and articles than to inventions.
>
|
